{SECTION_MENU
Pupil Premium
At Milton Park, we have a clear rationale that the best place to meet the needs of all of pupils is through our quality first classroom offer. Our school serves the area of Milton which has pockets of high deprivation. Therefore, we provide children and their families with enriching opportunities to widen their experiences and aspirations. When making decisions on allocating pupil premium funds, we take into account the needs of our community.
The Pupil Premium was introduced in April 2011 and is allocated to school to be of benefit to pupils who have been registered for free school meals at any point in the last six years. Schools also receive funding for children who have been looked after (in the care of the local authority) continuously for more than six months and children of service personnel.
Why was Pupil Premium Funding introduced?
The Government believes that the Pupil Premium Funding, which is additional to the main school funding is the best way to address the current underlying inequalities between children eligible for free school meals and their peers.
Who decided how the Pupil Premium Funding is spent?
In most cases the Pupil Premium is paid directly to school; allocated to them for every pupil who receives free school meals, is looked after or whose parent is in one of the services. Schools decide how to use the funding as we are the best place to assess what our pupils need.
How are schools accountable for the spending of Pupil Premium Funding?
We are held accountable for the decisions we make through:
- The performance tables that show the attainment and progress of Pupil Premium, FSM and LAC compared with their peers
- The new Ofsted inspection framework, under which the inspectors focus on the attainment and progress of various pupil groups, including those who are eligible for Pupil Premium
What barriers to education achievement can disadvantaged children at Milton Park Primary School face?
Disadvantaged pupils may face all sorts of difficulties which make it harder for them to achieve at school. They will be different for every individual but may include; unsettled home lives, lack of parental income to access optional extra-curricular activities, health issues within the family, responsibilities as a young carer, low self-esteem, poor organisational skills, previous negative family experiences of education, lack of equipment or uniform and issues with poor hygiene and housing.
Pupil premium strategy statement – Milton Park Primary School 2025-2028
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the outcomes for disadvantaged pupils last academic year.
School overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
Number of pupils in school |
327 |
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
25.08% |
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3-year plans are recommended – you must still publish an updated statement each academic year) |
2025-2028 |
|
Date this statement was published |
December 2025 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
December 2026 |
|
Statement authorised by |
Katharine Jordan |
|
Pupil premium lead |
Katharine Jordan |
|
Governor / Trustee lead |
Rev Turner |
Funding overview
|
Detail |
Amount |
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£160446.82 |
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
|
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£160446.82 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
The ultimate objective for our disadvantaged pupils is to raise attainment and improve learning outcomes, ensuring that every child has the opportunity to succeed regardless of background. Our strategy aims to:
- Improve academic outcomes for all pupils eligible for Pupil Premium.
- Support the well-being of pupils and families, fostering strong, trusting relationships between home and school to enable better learning.
- Remove barriers to learning and provide equitable access to high-quality education.
Key Principles of Our Strategy
- Quality First Teaching for All
We ensure that teaching and learning opportunities meet the needs of every pupil through consistently high-quality classroom practice. - Addressing Behaviour and Attendance
We implement effective behaviour strategies, respond swiftly to poor attendance, and provide strong social and emotional support, including close collaboration with families. - Meeting Social and Emotional Needs
Through pastoral care and trauma-informed approaches, we provide targeted support for vulnerable groups, ensuring that the needs of socially disadvantaged pupils are fully assessed and addressed. - Meeting Individual Learning Needs
We identify each pupil’s specific needs and deliver tailored support based on high-quality, evidence-based research. - Effective Staff Deployment
We place the right people in the right roles at the right time to maximize impact on pupils’ learning. - Ambitious Leadership and High Expectations
Leaders and staff share high aspirations for all pupils. We do not accept low expectations or variable performance. We invest in staff development and draw on best practice within and beyond the school. - Impact-Driven and Evidence-Responsive
We use data and evidence to identify learning needs, monitor progress, and address underperformance quickly. Our assessment systems are manageable, purposeful, and provide clear feedback to pupils.
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
|
1 |
Persistent and Severe Absence |
|
2 |
Underdeveloped Language and Social Skills on Entry |
|
3 |
Reading Attainment Gap |
|
4 |
Higher Rates of Illness and Unauthorised Absence |
|
5 |
SEND and Disadvantage Our assessments and observations show that a significant proportion of disadvantaged pupils are working below age-related expectations in the core areas of reading, writing, and mathematics. This underachievement is further compounded by a higher-than-average proportion of disadvantaged pupils who also have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), presenting additional barriers to OUTCOMES. |
|
6 |
Maths Attainment Gap |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Challenge addressed |
|
Improved attendance and reduced absence among Pupil Premium Pupils |
· Attendance rates for Pupil Premium pupils improve year-on-year, with the gap to non-Pupil Premium pupils reducing to below 1.5 percentage points. · Persistent absenteeism among Pupil Premium pupils decreases by at least 10% and aligns with or falls below that of their peers. · All families of Pupil Premium pupils with attendance concerns have tailored support plans in place. · Targeted interventions (e.g., mentoring, breakfast clubs) show measurable impact through improved individual attendance and case studies. · Increased engagement in whole-school attendance initiatives and positive feedback from Pupil Premium families. · Improvements are sustained across the academic year, with systems in place to monitor and respond to early signs of decline. |
1,2,3,4,5.6 |
|
Improved Language Development and Social-Emotional Skills in Early Years |
· Increased proportion of disadvantaged pupils achieving age-related expectations in Communication and Language by end of Reception. · Targeted pupils show accelerated progress in speech and language interventions. · Observations indicate improved wellbeing, emotional regulation, and peer interaction. · Parental engagement increases through workshops and support plans, with all identified families receiving guidance. · Intervention impact is evidenced through case studies, pupil voice, and staff feedback. · Gains in language and social-emotional development are sustained into Year 1, reducing the need for ongoing support. |
1,2 |
|
Narrow the reading attainment gap between disadvantaged pupils and their peers through targeted, high-quality teaching and intervention. |
· The proportion of disadvantaged pupils achieving age-related expectations in reading increases term-on-term. · The attainment gap in reading between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils reduces by at least X% (based on baseline data) by the end of the academic year. · Targeted pupils make accelerated progress in reading, as evidenced by formative and summative assessments (e.g., phonics screening, reading age assessments). · Intervention programmes (e.g., phonics catch-up, reading fluency groups) show measurable impact through pre- and post-intervention data. · Pupil voice and teacher observations indicate improved reading confidence, engagement, and enjoyment among disadvantaged pupils. |
2,3 |
|
Reduce absence due to illness and unauthorised reasons among Pupil Premium pupils to improve overall attendance and engagement. |
· Decrease in the percentage of Pupil Premium pupils absent due to illness or unauthorised reasons, based on attendance code analysis. · The gap in illness-related and unauthorised absence between Pupil Premium and non-Pupil Premium pupils narrows term-on-term. · All Pupil Premium pupils with repeated illness or unauthorised absence have targeted support plans in place. · Increased parental engagement and improved communication around attendance expectations and support. · Evidence of impact from health and wellbeing initiatives (e.g., access to school nurse, breakfast clubs, mental health support). |
1,4 |
|
Accelerate progress in reading and mathematics for disadvantaged pupils, including those with SEND, to close the attainment gap with their peers. |
· Increased proportion of disadvantaged pupils, including those with SEND, achieving age-related expectations in reading, writing, and maths. · Targeted pupils make accelerated progress from their starting points, as shown in teacher assessments and standardised data. · Intervention programmes demonstrate measurable impact through pre- and post-assessment data. · Regular progress reviews show narrowing of the attainment gap term-on-term. · Pupil progress meetings and case studies highlight effective support and improved outcomes for disadvantaged pupils with SEND. |
1,2,3,4,5,6 |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium funding this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £ 70,320
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
CPD: Subject leads release to develop pedagogy
Opening Worlds £5,000
|
Coaching to maximise effectiveness High quality teaching improves pupil outcomes, and effective professional development offers a crucial tool to develop teaching quality and enhance children’s outcomes in the classroom. Guided monitoring Monitoring is most effective when it provides a triangulation of evidence and indication of progress and understanding within a subject. Evidence shows that subject leads who demonstrate a degree of expertise in their field are more able to question pupils and colleagues in a meaningful and useful way. Staff meetings Staff meetings are scheduled to be led by subject leads in order to interrogate and enhance subject knowledge and appropriate pedagogy for learning. Observe Opening Worlds lesson x 3 |
2, 4 , 5
|
|
Targeted support in the Hive and classrooms p/t time teacher 0.4 F/t HLTA p/t LSA £14420.40 £38356 £12,448
£65230
|
· Targeted deployment, where teaching assistants are trained to deliver an intervention to small groups or individuals has a higher impact, whereas deployment of teaching assistants in everyday classroom environments has not been shown to have a positive impact on learner outcomes. · Support staff have been involved in the MITA scheme in order to further this end. · EEF research in targeted provision |
1,2,3,4,5 and 6
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support, structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £ 22,998
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Language screener Talk Boost/Speech and language/Neli KS 2 Talk Boost CPD (3 days x 2 people) Staff Meeting
£10,000
|
1. Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI)
· Backed by multiple EEF trials, NELI has shown consistent impact: o Children made +3 to +4 months’ additional progress in oral language skills. o Particularly effective for Reception pupils with poor spoken language. o Delivered by trained TAs through small-group and individual sessions over 20 weeks. 2. Talk Boost (KS1 & KS2)· Developed by Speech and Language UK (formerly I CAN). · Designed to improve speaking, listening, and communication skills in children with delayed language. · Evaluations show: o Children made 18 months’ progress in language skills over a 10-week period. o Improvements in confidence, classroom participation, and peer interaction. o KS2 Talk Boost specifically supports older children with persistent language difficulties, enhancing vocabulary, narrative skills, and comprehension. 3. Language Screeners & Speech and Language Support· Early identification through language screeners (e.g. WellComm) enables timely intervention. · Targeted speech and language support improves phonological awareness, expressive/receptive language, and school readiness. · These approaches align with EEF guidance on early intervention and oral language strategies, which can lead to +6 months’ progress when well implemented. |
2,3,5,6
|
|
Number Stacks
£ 300 |
Measured Impact
· A study involving 160 pupils showed an average progress of 9 months in Number Age over just 11 weeks of intervention. · Pupils gained an average of 6 new mathematical skills during this period. · The intervention was particularly effective for pupils with specific learning needs, helping them overcome barriers in understanding core maths concepts. [numberstacks.co.uk] School Case Studies· Pleasant Street Primary School (Liverpool) reported: o 100% of pupils made progress from their starting points. o In KS1, 63% reached age-related expectations (ARE) in Number & Place Value; 41% reached ARE across all categories. o In KS2, 83% reached ARE in Number & Place Value; 55% in two or more categories. o Pupils progressed by an average of 9–14 Key Skills, depending on year group. o Teachers noted improved confidence, engagement, and classroom performance. [numberstacks.co.uk] Practical and Scalable· Designed for 1:1 or small group interventions, with minimal training required. · Uses video tutorials and hands-on place-value counters to build conceptual understanding. · Aligns with EEF Maths Guidance on effective early maths interventions. · Includes initial assessments and fluency tasks to track progress and identify learning gaps. |
5,6 |
|
Nessy £250 |
Research-Based and Structured Literacy Approach · Based on Orton-Gillingham principles and the Science of Reading, Nessy uses structured synthetic phonics to build foundational literacy skills. · Recognised by AUSPELD, DSF, and awarded the British Dyslexia Association Quality Mark. [nessy.com] 2. Key Findings from Studies · Northern Ireland Study (2021): After 6–9 weeks, students using Nessy scored: o 73% higher in Oral Reading Fluency o 14.4% higher in single-word reading than non-users. [nessy.com] · Longitudinal Study (2014–2016): o Kindergarten students using Nessy increased grade-level benchmark achievement from 51% to 74%. o The highest-risk group reduced from 22% to 10%. o Gains were sustained over 2.5 years, with 79% meeting grade-level benchmarks by mid-Year 2. |
2,5 |
|
Hamish and Milo
£8,448
Afternoon sessions 3 x a week |
Research-Based Approach
|
1,4, 5 |
|
Golf resilience - To enhance the self-esteem, resilience, and mental wellbeing of disadvantaged pupils by using a structured golf-based intervention. Aiming for increased confidence, social-emotional growth, and improved engagement in learning.
Afternoon Sessions x 1 a week £4000 |
· Resilience Improvement via Golf · Self-Esteem Boost in Youth Sport · Mental Health & Golf · Physical Activity & Self-Esteem
|
1,4, 5 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £ 67,128.82
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Breakfast club After School Club 100 sessions for BSC £300 100 sessions for ASC £1000 25% Breakfast programme £1800
£3,100 |
Ensuring that pupils’ physical, mental, and emotional needs are met is foundational to effective learning. The EEF highlights the importance of:
|
1,4,5
|
|
Visits and Residential trips
£11,000 |
Cognitive and Academic Benefits
· EEF’s Teaching and Learning Toolkit notes that while the direct academic impact of outdoor adventure learning is not yet robustly quantified, there is wider evidence suggesting positive effects on self-efficacy, motivation, and teamwork, all of which are linked to improved academic outcomes. · The Learning Away initiative (Paul Hamlyn Foundation) found that residentials can lead to improved engagement, confidence, and relationships, which in turn support academic progress. These experiences offer impacts not achievable in traditional classroom settings, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Cultural Capital and Broader World Understanding· Residential and educational trips enhance pupils’ knowledge and understanding of the world, providing real-life context to classroom learning. · Exposure to new environments, cultures, and experiences helps build cultural capital, which is essential for social mobility and academic success Language Acquisition and Communication Skills· School trips, especially those involving cultural or language immersion, significantly enhance language acquisition. o Students gain real-world language practice, improving fluency, vocabulary, and confidence. o Immersive experiences help students internalise language structures and develop listening and speaking skills more effectively than classroom instruction alone Social and Emotional Development· Trips foster independence, resilience, and social interaction, especially when pupils are away from home. · They provide opportunities for team-building, empathy, and communication, which are crucial for emotional development and readiness to learn
|
1,2,3,4,5 |
|
Music services
£1000 |
· EEF research shows that arts participation, including music, can lead to +3 months’ additional academic progress per year, especially for disadvantaged pupils. · Music supports language development, enhancing phonological awareness, vocabulary, and verbal memory. · It builds cultural capital by exposing pupils to diverse cultures and traditions, enriching their understanding of the world. · Music education fosters confidence, emotional expression, and social skills, contributing to improved engagement and learning readiness. |
2,5
|
|
Family Engagement and attendance/parenting circle
Family Inclusion worker 21,000 Learning Mentor and Pastoral Lead £22,473
Attendance officer £8351.82
£51,778.82
|
EEF Evidence on Parental Engagement
· Parental engagement can lead to an average of +4 months’ additional academic progress per year. · Effective engagement is most impactful when it includes two-way communication, practical support for learning at home, and tailored approaches for disadvantaged families. · Building trusting relationships with families—especially post-COVID—is essential for sustained engagement and improved outcomes. Attendance and Pastoral Support· The EEF highlights that responsive, targeted interventions—such as those delivered by attendance officers, learning mentors, and pastoral leads—can improve attendance, particularly when they address individual barriers to school attendance. · Family Inclusion Workers and Attendance Officers play a key role in reducing persistent absence by building consistent, supportive relationships with families and ensuring early intervention. Parenting Circles and Support Programmes· Parenting programmes that focus on communication, routines, and emotional support can improve children’s self-regulation, behaviour, and academic outcomes. · Schools that offer structured, evidence-based parenting support (e.g. Triple P) see improvements in home-school relationships and pupil wellbeing |
1,2,3,4,5,6
|
|
Uniform £250 |
· The Department for Education (DfE) strongly encourages schools to adopt a uniform policy, stating that uniforms can: o Promote the ethos of the school o Provide a sense of belonging and identity o Help set an appropriate tone for learning o Support positive behaviour and discipline · Research indicates that when part of a broader school improvement strategy, school uniforms can contribute to a positive school culture, reduce peer pressure, and help pupils feel settled and ready to learn. · Providing uniform to disadvantaged pupils ensures equity and inclusion, enabling all children to feel part of the school community and reducing barriers to attendance and engagement. |
5
|
Total budgeted cost: £160,446.82
Teaching: £ 70,320
Targeted academic Support: £ 22,998
Wider Strategies: £ 67,128.82
Part B: Review of the previous academic yearReviewed December 2025OverviewThe school continues to prioritise improving outcomes and opportunities for disadvantaged pupils through targeted interventions and strategic initiatives. This review evaluates progress in attainment, attendance, and overall impact, identifying strengths and areas for development. Strengths1. Writing Outcomes
Writing
2. Multiplication check yr 4 Yr 4 MTC
Areas to continue targeting 1. Reading and Maths Trends
End of KS 2 outcomes Maths
Reading
Combined
2. Whole-School Attendance
Areas for Development 1. Combined Outcomes
2. Attendance Gap
3. Improved Language Development and Social-Emotional Skills in Early Years · On entry gap between disadvantage pupils and non-disadvantage pupils is evident and continues to widen. 4. Attainment gap in reading · This still continues to be an area of focus despite improvements. 5. Monitoring and Evaluation
Strategy Review2024-2025
|
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you used your pupil premium to fund in the previous academic year.
|
Programme |
Provider |
|
SEMH |
Hamish and Milo |
|
Dyslexia |
Nessy |
|
Times tables |
Timetables rock stars |
|
Number |
Nessy Number sense |
|
Opening Worlds curriculum |
Haringey Education Partnership |
|
Speech and language |
Talk Boost |
|
The Parenting Circle |
Parenting circle charity |
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
|
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information: How our service pupil premium allocation was spent last academic year |
|
None |
|
The impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils |
|
None |
Long Term Overview (3 years)
Setting priorities is key to maximising the use of the PPG. Our long- term priorities are identified in our 3-year strategic overview and progress towards them outlined in a detailed action plan relevant to each academic year. When establishing our priorities, we draw on research and evidence to understand strategies that will have maximum impact on pupil outcomes and relate them to the EEF tiered approach.
|
Headline Areas For Development 2025 – 2028
|
||||
|
Pupil Premium area for development |
Focus area
|
Pupil premium intended outcome |
||
|
2025 |
2026 |
2027 |
||
|
Teaching and targeted academic support |
Employ staff effectively and ensure all staff have the skills to support pupils in their care.
|
Improved progress and attainment for pupils eligible for Pupil Premium. |
||
|
Reading |
Raise standards in phonics and reading to match non-Pupil Premium peers. |
Close the gap in phonics screening and reading outcomes between Pupil Premium and non-Pupil Premium pupils. |
||
|
SEND |
Meet the needs of the growing disadvantaged SEND population within the school. |
Reduce barriers to learning for pupils who are disadvantaged and have SEND. |
||
|
Maths |
Raise standards in maths to match non-Pupil Premium peers. |
Close the attainment gap in maths between Pupil Premium and non-Pupil Premium pupils. |
||
|
Attendance |
Improve and maintain attendance and punctuality for disadvantaged pupils. |
Increase attendance rates for pupils eligible for Pupil Premium and reduce the gap with peers. |
||
Download pupil premium strategy 2025-2026
Pupil Premium Strategy 2024-2025
PP Strategy plan 2024 - 2025.docx
Historic Pupil Premium Spending Strategy and Reviews
PP Strategy plan 2023-2024 Review
PP Strategy plan 2022-23 MPPS.
pp-strategy-plan-2021-24-mpps.
pupil-premium-strategy-2020-21
pupil-premium-strategy-statement-2019-20-and-review
Pupil Premium strategy statement 2018-2019.
Department for Education Articles and advice for children and young people.



↑



